Digglyda wrote:
Even if it were at odds of 100 to 1 or more, I think it would be a neat fog-of-war factor if a wounded political General was replaced by a real war-horse of a colonel ...just like happened now and again historically.
Yeah, I agree with you... I was only suggesting a possible why.
Digglyda wrote:
Probably not worth implementing as most players should be striving to minimise leader casaualties anyway.
Well, here I don't really agree... lol
In the war, the good brigade leaders were up front, LEADING. That's why there were so many casualties in the leaders and why they were good leaders. I know it's a personal choice, but I usually have my brigade leaders up front with a regiment, it adds to the morale, gives bonuses. But, they do get shot...
Then again, if I have a replacement leader, those guys are so eager to show they can do the job, they are always in the front lines...
But I always strive to keep division/corps/ARMY commanders out of the line of fire... if they get disabled, it really <screws> things up...