I take it back.
Although I can't see any mention of the 'fix' in the Changelog, it appears the campaigns are now carrying over losses.
I tested it using Jackson's Valley Campaign, 1862 in Campaign Shenandoah against the AI. I made notes on the men remaining in the Stonewall Brigade to see what happened in the next scenario. Although First Kernstown was a massive victory for the CSA, 27 Va. suffered terribly. By the end of the battle their compliment of 170 men was reduced to a measly 16 men. I proceeded to the next scenario which happened to be '017 McDowell V2'. When the Stonewall Brigade entered they had 63 men. Normally in that scenario, 27 Va. starts with 170 men. So, although 27 Va. had got some reinforcements, they were still a very small regiment due to how they had suffered at Kernstown.
So, it appears the carry-over problem has been fixed although no mention seems to have been made about. That's really good news. Thank-you WDS.
So Dwain, I'm sorry about the misleading advice above. Based upon the old advice from JTS, unless the opening campaign blurb says something about losses not carrying over those losses should carry over. Enjoy your game. I also had a quick look at one of the campaigns (Campaign Corinth) in Campaign Corinth and could see nothing in the opening blurb that mentioned that losses do not carry over so I would say that that one should be fine too. You will have to read the opening statements on any campaign you want to play to see what the situation is going to be regarding losses between the scenarios.
_________________ Paul Swanson Lieutenant-General First Division First Corps Army of Northern Virginia
|