Napoleonic Wargame Club

The Rhine Tavern

*   NWC   NWC Staff   NWC Rules   NWC (DoR) Records   About Us   Send Email Inquiry to NWC

*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général    La Grande Armée Officer Records    Join La Grande Armée

*   Allied Coalition   Allied Officers   Join Coalition

*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army   Anglo Allied Army (AAA)   Imperial Russian Corps


Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:51 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Optional House Rules
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:39 am 

Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:01 am
Posts: 1361
Location: USA
I'm soliciting opinions on the use of the Optional House Rules in the HPS games posted here at the NWC site.

My own opinion is I don't like most of the ones relating to infantry vs cavalry relationships and movement restrictions. I find it unrealistic to believe that a small sqadron will hamper in any serious manner the movment of an 1100 man infantry battalion. To not allow the battalion to move adjacent to a small formation and fire on it is kind of ridiculous. I could live with a restriction based on some sort of size ratio between the formations. Say something along the lines of 1:2 cavalry to infantry the move adjancet to the cavalry is not permitted. Same applies to infantry surrounding or pursing small units of cavalry.

I do totally agree with leashes on the skirmishers and will not play without them. I think the requirement for the leash should be some number of hexes in front of ANY formed unit (does not have to be the parent). There are thousands of examples of skirmishers or isolated portions of units fighting on alone, or after re-establishing contact with some other units of their army.In my recent readings about the 1813 Campaign there are even numerous examples of Prussian and Russian regiments deplying skirmishers to screen each other.

These are my main disagreements, What do others believe? To all my opponents present and future please do not expect my compliance to any of the optional house rules by default.

Happy holiday to all,

Capt. Ed Blackburn
1/50th West Kent, 6th Div, II Corps, AAA

Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:40 am 

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 9:37 am
Posts: 73
Location: USA
When it comes to house rules or any optional rules I'm kind of fast & loose. I discuss it with my opponent prior to our game and we come to an agreement about our preferences. For the most part I can play with any rules as long as both sides have the set in stone before we start.

<hr noshade size="1"><center>[url=""]Major Michael "Zettlemyer" Davies[/url]
2 é Chevauxleger Rgt “Königâ€

Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 3:48 am 
I totally agree with zinkyusa's opinion on Optional House Rules! Trying to make a simulation software more realistic by adding more <u>artificial</u> rules is... unrealistic! [:p]

[url=""]Lt Pierre-Yves Guinard[/url],
6e Division, II Corp

Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Localized by Maël Soucaze © 2010