Napoleonic Wargame Club

The Rhine Tavern

*   NWC   NWC Staff   NWC Rules   NWC (DoR) Records   About Us   Send Email Inquiry to NWC

*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général    La Grande Armée Officer Records    Join La Grande Armée

*   Allied Coalition   Allied Officers   Join Coalition

*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army   Anglo Allied Army (AAA)   Imperial Russian Corps

 

Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:11 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Quality estimation
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 12:32 am
Posts: 903
Location: Moscow, Russia
Gents!

The games used in our club give us a very interesting opportunity. To feel ourselves in shoes of real leaders, to make strategical and operational decisions, to win and loose the battles. But still they remain just a model of reality and if one decides to study the history using these games he would have to interprete all these figures given in terms of real world. What means fatigue of 173? How many cartriges are in 241 strong supply unit? What is leadership quality D and so on?

Most of this is rather clear and easy to estimate. The most difficult, as always, are people. How to estimate quality of the unit? It's left up to scenario designer. With most of the estimations I can agree after some consideration, but some really leave me puzzled for a long time. So. The proposal is to set a kind of house rule, on how the quality is estimated. Here is my proposal. It's based on similar thing used by Al Amos for his EAW scenarious.

1. Average units in all the armies on the continent (Europe) were using approximately the same tactics and were approximately of the same quality. Let this "zero" level be C.
2. If the unit is newly formed (within one year but more than one month) it receives -1 bonus.
3. If the units presents minutemen just called to defend the country or armed civilians or newly ormed unit (less than one month) it receives -2 bonus.
4. If the unit consists of specially selected men - like heavy cavalry, grenadies, some kinds of jaegers and so on it receives +1 bonus.
5. If it has army elite or guard status it receives +2 bonus. Army elite should be applied for example to french carabiniers (horse), 95th rifles Pavlovs grenadiers and so on.
6. If unit has served as whole through one full campaign it receives +1 bonus.
7. The same for several campaigns but with +2 bonus.

This classification allows to rate units from E t A++. F and A+++ would be left for designers consideration.

I now work on rating according to this system of Polish Vth corps, Lithunian newly raised corps and several russian regiments for comparison. All your ideas and critics are welcome.

Thanks for attention!

Malorossiyskogo Grenaderskogo Polku
Polkovnik Anton Kosyanenko
2ya Grenaderskaya Diviziya,
8oi Pekhotnyi Korpus,
2ya Zapadnaya Armiya


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 7:33 am
Posts: 312
Location: United Kingdom
Is there a problem with automatically associating the terms 'Guards' and 'elite'?

Just an uninformed thought. [:)]

<font color="orange">Majoor Peter Robinson
[url="http://www.dutchcorps.com"]Koninklijke Militaire Academie[/url] Adjutant
C.O. Divisie Nederlandsche Kavallerie
3rd (Prince of Wales's) Dragoon Guards</font id="orange">


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 12:32 am
Posts: 903
Location: Moscow, Russia
Thanks, Peter!

Yes I devided them intentionally. A couple of examples:

-Russian Leib-Guard Horse regiment in it's famous charge at Austerlitz field lost almost all of it's men and horses. Hence somewhere in 1806-07 still remaining an elite unit it won't have A++ quality as it would in 1805.

-3-eme Lanciers de la Garde Imperiale (Lithunians). This regiment was formed in the middle of 1812 and was treated as a guard unit. It consisted of almost 1300 men. Still it was not as good as for example 1ere lanciers which the history well proved. Maximum I'd assign them quality of B - an elite unit with less than one year history.

Malorossiyskogo Grenaderskogo Polku
Polkovnik Anton Kosyanenko
2ya Grenaderskaya Diviziya,
8oi Pekhotnyi Korpus,
2ya Zapadnaya Armiya


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY
Localized by MaĆ«l Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr