Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC) https://wargame.ch/board/nwc/ |
|
A Toast to Marechal Nowacki! https://wargame.ch/board/nwc/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6639 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | Tim Cavallin [ Tue May 24, 2005 6:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Holy cow... sounds like quite a pounding match! |
Author: | Sir Muddy [ Tue May 24, 2005 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I am ceratin that it would make a good article on tactics for the NWC Newsletter. Why not take some snapshots and write a little description? The Editor would certainly be pleased with your contribution. [:D] FM Sir 'Muddy' Jones, KG 2nd Life Guards, Household Cavalry CO, Cavalry Corps Allied CiC |
Author: | Mike Cox [ Wed May 25, 2005 4:44 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Always willing to drink...to the Polish Lion. To your health Marechal! <b>Général de Division Michael Cox</b> <font size="4"><i>Principe <font size="1">della </font id="size1">Toscana</i></font id="size4"> Comte de Moselle <i><font size="4">Armée du Rhin</font id="size4"> <font size="2">2e battallion, 1er Regiment de Chasseurs a Pied, Inf. de l'V. Gde.</i></font id="size2"> <font size="1"><u>In Regards to Skirmisher Flop by Melee Losers:</u> <ul><li>Make it an optional rather than fixed rule (at the very least). </li> <li>Skirmisher stack size relative to retreating formed unit should be a factor (whether in clear or covered terrain). </li> <li>For skirmishers, (not leaders or wagons) covered terrain (swamp, building, city, town, forest, marsh, and perhaps orchard) should negate the overrun result.</li></font id="size1"> </ul> |
Author: | Baron [ Tue May 31, 2005 4:14 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The "Battle of Giants" continues. Turn 13 (only 5th after armies got into contact) sees more glorious charges and counter-charges, resulting in almost unbeliavable bloodshed. Current loses are: French 302 infantry 14720 cavalry 13 guns 22 commanders Russians 19 infantry 10583 cavalry 12 guns 8 commanders GL. Pavel Stafa Leib-gvardii Preobrazhenskiy polk Kommanduyuschiy Korpusom Rezerva 2-oy Zapadnoy armii EIV |
Author: | Kosyanenko [ Tue May 31, 2005 4:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Oh my! You guys ar really determined! Honestly I can't imagine how to loose 10-15 thousand cavalry in 5 turns[:I] <center></center> <center><b>Eyo Imperatorskogo Velichestva Leib-Kirassirskogo polku Polkovnik Anton Kosyanenko</b></center> |
Author: | Baron [ Tue May 31, 2005 4:25 am ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Kosyanenko</i> <br />Oh my! You guys ar really determined! Honestly I can't imagine how to loose 10-15 thousand cavalry in 5 turns[:I]<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> No piece of holy soil of Russia should be given to attackers! [:D] GL. Pavel Stafa Leib-gvardii Preobrazhenskiy polk Kommanduyuschiy Korpusom Rezerva 2-oy Zapadnoy armii EIV |
Author: | Kosyanenko [ Tue May 31, 2005 4:42 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm very keen on integrity of our lands myself![^] But make sure to save at least some men for reproduction. Or we would have no one to work these lands[:I] <center></center> <center><b>Eyo Imperatorskogo Velichestva Leib-Kirassirskogo polku Polkovnik Anton Kosyanenko</b></center> |
Author: | Mark Eason [ Tue May 31, 2005 5:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Baron</i> resulting in almost unbeliavable bloodshed. Current loses are: French 302 infantry 14720 cavalry 13 guns 22 commanders Russians 19 infantry 10583 cavalry 12 guns 8 commanders <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Is this an all cavalry scenario or are there any more infantry there? I don't think I have ever seen cavalry losses on this scale and certainly not this early after contact. Are there not many turns in this scenario? Intrigued Mark VII Corps |
Author: | Baron [ Tue May 31, 2005 5:26 am ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Mark Eason</i> <br />Is this an all cavalry scenario or are there any more infantry there? I don't think I have ever seen cavalry losses on this scale and certainly not this early after contact. Are there not many turns in this scenario?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Well, its NRC TwinPeaks, a 2-day battle, where opponents start at opposite (W & E) map edges and cavalry reaches line of battle about 3 turns before infantry is able to [:)] GL. Pavel Stafa Leib-gvardii Preobrazhenskiy polk Kommanduyuschiy Korpusom Rezerva 2-oy Zapadnoy armii EIV |
Author: | Mark Eason [ Tue May 31, 2005 6:14 am ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Baron</i> Well, its NRC TwinPeaks, a 2-day battle, where opponents start at opposite (W & E) map edges and cavalry reaches line of battle about 3 turns before infantry is able to [:)] <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Thanks Pavel Now I understand. And because they can reach each other in three turns, they do; with avengeance [:D] Regards Mark VII Corps |
Author: | pacowork [ Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Mark Eason</i> Now I understand. And because they can reach each other in three turns, they do; with avengeance [:D] Regards Mark VII Corps <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Mark, It's a little more complicated than that and Pavel is being much too modest. Our esteemed opponents have hit upon a very clever Russian tactic which Tomasz and I were much too slow to fathom, mayhaps because we have campaigned for so long in Central Europe rather than the steppes [B)]. Specifically, the Russians have a decided numerical superiority in cavalry, on the order of 3/2, albeit nearly half of it consists of cossacks. Despite their lower morale, however, they are rated as "lancers" in NRC and, when used <i>en masse</i>, can kill elite French cav as well as any Gd Dragoon or cuirassier. Given the initial Russian numerical superiority, Pavel & Jeka have simply launched an all-out cavalry action, on all fronts. Their initial losses were acceptable since they a) were trading low-morale cossacks for elite cav, and b) their overall numerical advantage means that a straight battle of cav attrition would always end in their favor.[:(] My hat is off to them for devising a crude, but nonetheless effective, strategy. Regards, Paco <i>Maréchal M. Francisco Palomo Comte de Marseille Duc d'Abrantes Commandant - Division de Cavalerie de la Vieille Garde</i> CO - <i>Iere Corps de Armee</i> |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |