Napoleonic Wargame Club

The Rhine Tavern

*   NWC   NWC Staff   NWC Rules   NWC (DoR) Records   About Us   Send Email Inquiry to NWC

*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général    La Grande Armée Officer Records    Join La Grande Armée

*   Allied Coalition   Allied Officers   Join Coalition

*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army   Anglo Allied Army (AAA)   Imperial Russian Corps

 

Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2018 2:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2001 12:13 am
Posts: 583
Location: USA
I hesitate to jump into the question of this club supporting the game for a few reasons. Part of it is the very obvious conflict of interest, and part of it is that I've only started to be semi-active in the very recent past again, so my voice should be that of the minnow.

But, I have personal mixed feelings on the issue.

On an obvious level, there is a part of me that would like to see the game supported, simply out of self-interest and ego-gratification. I would like to see the game go well, so we can do more. I also like to see people enjoy what I've spent so much time on.

On the other hand, this club is, and has been, tightly focused on Napoleonics. There are certainly connections between the games. Some soldiers in the 7YW are generals in the Nap games. (Hello Duke of Brunswick.) Also, switching between 7YW and RBR/Marengo gives the ability to see the evolution of warfare from late linear to the Revolutionary era, (and the further developments by the time of Leipzig into full blown Napoleonic warfare. However, even with those connections, the bright lines are relatively clear. The political change from the Cabinet Wars to the Revolution, and the tactical changes brought about by the Revolutionary Wars.

You can make an argument indeed for SYW, but then how far do you go? I can't give names/titles, but I can assure you that there are more M&P games coming. I CAN tell you that at least in the short term the War of the Austrian Succession is not one of them. What do you do then? The linkages from SYW to NAP are fairly clear, but how far bad do you want to go? The first M&P game was REN, and now we have the SYW. Even if we assume that they are bookends, think about what lies in between. WAS, WSS, War of the League of Augsburg, GNW, 30 Years War, Danubian Wars.... Obviously, as that list went on, it got less and less Napoleonic.

Still though, I don't think that a separate M&P Club is really viable, even with this new entry. It just won't get the "weight" of people and activity to make it work.

So, how do I feel? I am, as I said, mixed, and I see both sides of this issue. I would certainly say that it's something that would need to be done with discussion, not only with a few forum warriors, but even seeing what the larger membership thinks. It's certainly a fairly profound change to make the step.

I can tell you that the game is already set up for play at the Blitz, so there is at least that forum out there for games to be found.

_________________
Feldmarschall Freiherr Gary McClellan
IR44
Portner Grenadier Battalion
Austrian Army

Scenario Designer:
JTS Midway
JTS Seven Years War


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2018 8:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:18 am
Posts: 5738
Location:
No, I would stop at the Seven Years War. The REN does not fit this club at all. Neither would a game on the Thirty Years War, ECW etc.

_________________
Bill Peters - Prussian civilian observer
Scenario Designer for John Tiller Software "Napoleonic Battles" and "Panzer Campigns" series games


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2018 9:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:55 am
Posts: 1128
Location: Bouches-de-l’Elbe
I guess we have to see where the series moves to and what comes next. Currently I'm not sure if SYW is closer to the Napi series or closer to REN, if more games come out one could judge if it's justified to add SYW here or not.

_________________
Général Christian Hecht
Commandant en Chef de la Grande Armée

Image


Last edited by Christian Hecht on Sun Sep 09, 2018 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2018 2:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:14 am
Posts: 184
... I think the question is more like -do you draw the line at SYW? But what about the War of Spanish Succession, the War of Austrian Succession, the Great Northern War, or possibly even later than 1815... where is the line?

Personally it doesn't matter to me all that much if anything else gets included, because talking about the history, or even engine capabilities is really more what I would be interested in regardless of period.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 5:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2001 12:13 am
Posts: 583
Location: USA
(oops, put something in the wrong thread like a doofus. Copy/pasting where it belongs)

_________________
Feldmarschall Freiherr Gary McClellan
IR44
Portner Grenadier Battalion
Austrian Army

Scenario Designer:
JTS Midway
JTS Seven Years War


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2001 12:13 am
Posts: 583
Location: USA
As I've got a few minutes I thought I'd post a bit on something I've seen mentioned in different places.

Why aren't there more scenarios with lots of movement options? After all, a number of the scenarios (like say Zorndorf or Kunersdorf) have the forces pretty much in position to fight right away, and you're left with more slugging match than maneuver.)

There's a few reasons for that. First of all, I would like to point out that there are some scenarios that have "longer" versions which allow for more approach maneuver (Lobositz, Prague, Kolin, Rossbach, Leuthen come to mind.)

However, there are a few issues in to keep in mind here. I'm sure not everyone will agree, but here's the thought pattern.

First of all, as I've talked about before, these armies are pretty rigid compared to the armies of the Napoleonic Era. They had carefully prescribed march orders and followed some very clockwork type maneuvers. They didn't really have the operational freedom to simply change all of that on a whim and send troops off in new directions. If you notice the scenarios with approach marches, even then the march formation is designed to get into deployment fairly quickly. Honestly, in all of John's Blackpowder games, there's too much ability for players to send troops off here, there and everywhere, but with the army restrictions of the SYW, that is even more pronounced. The rules about no detached melee are in part designed to deal with that, but the setup of the scenarios does that as well.

Another issue is the nature of the scenarios that would create. You didn't necessarily have a huge number of "meeting engagements" in the war, especially among the larger battles. A very common theme was that one side would be dug into an attacking position, and the other would maneuver to attack them to best advantage. On many occasions, the defending side moved little if at all in response (Leuthen and Hochkirch would be good examples of that.) On others, there might be some shifting of reserves (Prague and Kolin would be examples of there) but beyond that, little overall movement. At Zorndorf and Torgau, the Russians and Austrians did reverse their position to face the opposite direction, but there was little movement beyond that. (Well, ok, at Leuthen, the Austrians did move some reserves. In the wrong direction. Oops.)

That means that in a game situation, you'd have a situation where one player would have the chance to move a great deal while the other would be stuck "fixed" until they could see the enemy movements. Not a terribly exciting game prospect if I'm the Russian at Zorndorf waiting for Frederick to decide where to attack from and hitting "end turn" because everyone is fixed.

Let's take Zorndorf as an example. The night before the battle, Frederick was N of the Russian army, so the Russians set up facing N. However, starting at 3:00 in the morning, Frederick sent his troops on a flank march across the Russian E flank all the way around the army, so they would get into position S of the Russian army to attack in the morning. In order to make that work in game, I would first of all have to set night moves as 15 minutes, otherwise the Prussians simply wouldn't have enough time to make the march. Second, the Russians would likely have to be fixed (other than the Cav pickets) leading to some pretty boring play for the first 20-25 turns of the game. Unless of course the Prussians decided to launch a night attack from the N, counting on the chaos and Russian Fixed units to give them the win. Bleh.

This is one of the reasons that Kolin and Torgau have the "Campaign in One" in game right now, where it gives the players the chance to decide on operational movements and different avenues of attack, while sidestepping most of the above issues. If they're popular, I can easily do them for some of the other battles (Zorndorf and Kunersdorf likely at the top of that list)

I will say that there will be some hypothetical scenarios in the upcoming expansion that will have a bit more maneuver possiblity. Then also Wilhelmstahl which is going to be a fairly wide open battle with Ferdinand attacking in three sectors and five columns.

_________________
Feldmarschall Freiherr Gary McClellan
IR44
Portner Grenadier Battalion
Austrian Army

Scenario Designer:
JTS Midway
JTS Seven Years War


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2001 12:13 am
Posts: 583
Location: USA
Just wanted to give people a headsup that Rich released a SYW patch today that includes the 3D images. Hope you enjoy :)

_________________
Feldmarschall Freiherr Gary McClellan
IR44
Portner Grenadier Battalion
Austrian Army

Scenario Designer:
JTS Midway
JTS Seven Years War


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:51 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:55 am
Posts: 1128
Location: Bouches-de-l’Elbe
Thanks, the club welcomes your note.

_________________
Général Christian Hecht
Commandant en Chef de la Grande Armée

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:49 pm
Posts: 80
Just purchased. Me likey. Congrats Gary and Rich and John.

_________________
Chef d'Escadron Al Amos
1er Régiment de Dragons
Cavalerie, 2ème Division,
3éme Corps d'Armée, La Grande Armée


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:49 pm
Posts: 80
Hey Gary!

Love the game, quick question. Infantry attacking Cavalry in village, can't do it. Any reason?

_________________
Chef d'Escadron Al Amos
1er Régiment de Dragons
Cavalerie, 2ème Division,
3éme Corps d'Armée, La Grande Armée


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2001 12:13 am
Posts: 583
Location: USA
Al, no, no there isn't. I'll have to do some testing and throw it in the list of things "to be looked at" with the rest of the M&P team. Thanks for the headsup. (I never noticed this, since I don't put horses in towns)

_________________
Feldmarschall Freiherr Gary McClellan
IR44
Portner Grenadier Battalion
Austrian Army

Scenario Designer:
JTS Midway
JTS Seven Years War


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:49 pm
Posts: 80
Gary McClellan wrote:
Al, no, no there isn't. I'll have to do some testing and throw it in the list of things "to be looked at" with the rest of the M&P team. Thanks for the headsup. (I never noticed this, since I don't put horses in towns)


I had an opponent put cavalry on an objective hex in a village. In the Nap engine, a good inf charge would clear that mess up. ;-)

I tried to melee and got a message inf must be in block to melee cav. I tried to change an inf unit in the open into block and wasn't able to.

I see in the OOB file (which I love the expanded capabilities) where a flag can be entered to allow inf to form block. I'm wondering if one did that would that be equivalent to the Square in the Nap engine, and would said unit be able to take offensive action. If so that would be so cool since units could move in square etc. I know in SYW squares weren't used, but it was known (just a thought.)

Way off topic, with the four rank inf, and the two rank inf, would Waterloo look cool with Brits in 4 ranks and Frogs in 2 ranks .... and giving units different VP values, and movement rates. .... and being able to have different alliances ... oh don't get me started. hehehehe...'

_________________
Chef d'Escadron Al Amos
1er Régiment de Dragons
Cavalerie, 2ème Division,
3éme Corps d'Armée, La Grande Armée


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2001 12:13 am
Posts: 583
Location: USA
Block has its own set of rules (which absolutely would not work in the SYW era). It's a function of the engine being "Musket and PIKE". Rich used it in REN, and I imagine some of the upcoming games will also need it.

That's kind of the trick with the M&P engine, since we're working over a period of a few centuries, the engine is flexible, but not everything that is needed for one game applies to the others.

But yeah, infantry really should be able to bounce cav out at bayonet point if they're in towns.

_________________
Feldmarschall Freiherr Gary McClellan
IR44
Portner Grenadier Battalion
Austrian Army

Scenario Designer:
JTS Midway
JTS Seven Years War


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
POWERED_BY
Localized by Maël Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr