American Civil War Game Club (ACWGC)

ACWGC Forums

* ACWGC    * Dpt. of Records (DoR)    *Club Recruiting Office     ACWGC Memorial

* CSA HQ    * VMI   * Join CSA    

* Union HQ   * UMA   * Join Union    

CSA Armies:   ANV   AoT

Union Armies:   AotP    AotT

Link Express

Club Forums:     NWC    CCC     Home Pages:     NWC    CCC    ACWGC
It is currently Sun Nov 09, 2025 3:42 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2025 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 1:55 am
Posts: 1197
Location: Tennessee
EPISODE 2.14 -
December 16, 2005

Who is Joe Holt and why is he saying these things
Guest: Elizabeth Leonard

Dr. Elizabeth Leonard, author of Lincoln's Avengers and All the Daring of the Soldier: Women of the Civil War Armies, covers topics from the Lincoln assassination to the participation of women soldiers


Blake's Review:
Another poor interview. Look, I don't mind discussing Women in the Civil War. But this interview was all over the place and failed to really dig deep into anything. The interview began with Gerry asking the supposedly rhetorical question, "why should a Civil War reader/historian care to read about women's roles in the Civil War?" The obvious point being that war is fought by men and in the 19th Century this was especially true. The guest basically answered with saying something along the lines of half of the people in America were women and if you ignore them you can't really get the whole picture of the Civil War. Okay. Half the pets in the world are cats. I find reading about dogs far more interesting because I prefer dogs. If you argue I should read about cats more because I am failing to understand the true story of pets in America then my response would be, "so what?" I kind of felt like that here. They do discuss the pitfalls of historians going too deeply down the rabbit hole of studying smaller and smaller interest groups and whether or not turning away from the traditional historical political and war-based history is a good or bad thing for history. If people who claim to write about the Civil War can't tell you who led the Army of Tennessee but can tell you how many slaves existed in Kentucky in 1863, then that's probably a problem. They agree there should be a middle ground for historians and I concur. Teaching people to be well-rounded in their approach to the war is a good thing. But, as for this interview, sorry, I just didn't get hooked in and turned it off about halfway through.

_________________
Gen. Blake Strickler
Confederate General-in-Chief
El Presidente 2010 - 2012

Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group