<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by jmishurda</i>
. . . An alternative to this would be to have levels of isolation (100%, 75%, 50% then 25% Effective) with each trun they remain isolated.
Col. Joe Mishurda
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Col. Mishurda,
I like the idea of the 'increasing levels of isolation effects' you mentioned, maybe with unit quality figured into the equation. Of course, surrounded & isolated units don't surrender automatically now unless they are routed -- you still have to blast them into submission. I think your main concern is about their reduced ability to fight, and some sort of 'increasing levels of isolation effects', so the longer a unit was isolated the worse it fought, might be appropriate.
Your humble servant,
LGen 'Dee Dubya' Mallory
David W. Mallory
ACW - Lieutenant General, First ('Grey Line') Corps, AotM
CCC - Corporal, Georgia Volunteers, Southern Regional Deaprtment, Colonial American Army
|