American Civil War Game Club (ACWGC)

ACWGC Forums

* ACWGC    * Dpt. of Records (DoR)    *Club Recruiting Office     ACWGC Memorial

* CSA HQ    * VMI   * Join CSA    

* Union HQ   * UMA   * Join Union    

CSA Armies:   ANV  AoT

Union Armies:   AotP    AotT

Link Express

Club Forums:     NWC    CCC     Home Pages:     NWC    CCC    ACWGC
It is currently Mon May 11, 2026 6:43 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2026 10:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2026 6:02 pm
Posts: 5
The title's pretty self-explanatory - what titles do y'all feel like are the best for PBEM and which ones are the worst? I have been playing against the AI for years, and have mainly purchased titles where I thought the battles were interesting or based on how enjoyable playing the AI would be (for instance, assuming that playing any large scenario against the AI would not be very fun for very long). But playing against an actual person is different. I thought the various small battle scenarios in Forgotten Campaigns were interesting, but a number were admittedly gimmicky, and looking through the DOR records and the game guides, the Club as a whole doesn't seem to use that title much. Same with Campaign Ozark - I played that title against the AI quite a bit because I found those battles interesting, but if I'm pulling the DOR data correctly, there have only been 15 completed games from that title since the start of 2023.

_________________
Fld Lt Will Koch
5th Brigade, 3rd Division, I Corps
Army of Northern Virginia
CSA


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2026 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 1:55 am
Posts: 1267
Location: Tennessee
Excellent use of the DOR, sir!

You are correct about those titles being less popular than others when it comes to playability in a man vs. man contest. Most people (but definitely not all) look for medium to large-scale battles to play against another human opponent. I would also argue that meeting engagements are the most popular style of contest in the Club. Recently a number of Equal Force scenarios have also gained in popularity and can be downloaded and added to the games from the Club's Custom Scenario page at ACWGC.net.

The Club has four "big titles" which everyone seems to own and enjoy. Those are WDS Antietam, Gettysburg, Shiloh, and Chickamauga. Just these four titles account for over half of all the registered games in the DOR. These titles feature many fun campaigns and scenarios for either A/I, competitive, or multiplayer gameplay.

My own opinion is that Antietam and Shiloh are the two most enjoyable. But you really can't go wrong with any of them.

_________________
Gen. Blake Strickler
Confederate General-in-Chief
El Presidente 2010 - 2012

Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2026 1:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:42 pm
Posts: 947
Location: Port Macquarie NSW Australia
I don't have a favourite title, although Shenandoah used to be my favourite.

I look for 'balanced' games. To me 'balanced' means that each side has a fair chance of winning and the forces deployed are appropriate for the map size. I especially dislike scenarios where there are many units crammed into a too-small map. I have found several balanced scenarios that I have played many times (often as both sides) and the joy has been that they play out differently each time. Some of those I have played repeatedly are:
Antietam 002 Bull Run, 014 2nd Bull Run;
Chickamauga - 005 Perryville (plus variants), 039 Chickamauga (plus variants), 107 On to Nashville;
Corinth - cfc12u4 Purdy (plus variants); and
Shenandoah - 041 Goods Farm, 049 Cross Keys.

There are others but the above are the main ones. I can't recall any of those listed playing the same way twice. I'm sure to play them again at some stage although lately my main interest is in bigger battles on large maps, three days or more in length. It is essential that your opponent in such large scenarios is a fast responder, unless you like to play the one scenario for a year or more.

You mention Forgotten as not being used much. In part that is because it was the last title released. Late last year I analysed the total number of plays recorded in the DoR for all the titles and got the following results:
1. Gettysburg - 3,638.
2. Antietam - 2,038.
3. Corinth - 1,727.
4. Shiloh - 1,642.
5. Chickamauga - 1550.
6. Ozark - 1,032.
7. Peninsula - 950.
8. Atlanta 948.
9. Vicksburg - 846.
10. Chancellorsville - 709.
11. Shenandoah - 514.
12. Franklin - 498.
13. Overland - 454.
14. Petersburg - 146.
15. Forgotten - 100.

It was pointed out to me that the analysis was probably skewed by the release dates of the various titles. So, I analysed recorded plays from 2022 and got the following:
1. Antietam - 312.
2. Gettysburg - 237.
3. Chickamauga - 190.
4. Shenandoah - 161.
5. Vicksburg - 132.
6. Shiloh - 106.
7. Overland - 95.
8. Forgotten - 91.
9. Chancellorsville - 78.
10. Ozark - 57.
11. Atlanta - 54.
12. Corinth - 52.
13. Peninsula - 41.
14. Franklin - 38.
15. Petersburg - 36.

_________________
Paul Swanson
Lieutenant-General
First Division
First Corps
Army of Northern Virginia


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 152 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group