American Civil War Game Club (ACWGC)

ACWGC Forums

* ACWGC    * Dpt. of Records (DoR)    *Club Recruiting Office     ACWGC Memorial

* CSA HQ    * VMI   * Join CSA    

* Union HQ   * UMA   * Join Union    

CSA Armies:   ANV   AoT

Union Armies:   AotP    AotT    Union Army Forums

Link Express

Club Forums:     NWC    CCC     Home Pages:     NWC    CCC    ACWGC
It is currently Tue Dec 05, 2023 1:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: "America's Great Debate"
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:29 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 11:25 am
Posts: 1022
Location: USA
"America's Great Debate - Henry Clay, Stephen A. Douglas, and the Compromise that Preserved the Union", by Fergus M. Bordewich.

I enjoy reading about events leading up to the American Civil War. I've read a couple of books about the Mexican War, and how it served as the training ground for many young officers who would go on to become battlefield leaders in the Civil War. This book focuses not on the military, but on political actions during the year 1850. It not only gives an overview of the politics, but introduces many of the politicians who ended up in leadership positions during the Civil War, both as battlefield leaders and as political leaders of the two sides.

As a result of the Mexican War, the United States acquired a vast amount of territory - basically, everything between the Louisiana Purchase and the Pacific Ocean. How should this new territory be governed? Specifically, should slavery be allowed, or forbidden?

The major issues:

1) The Mexican War ended in 1848. The very next year gold was discovered in California, ushering in the Gold Rush. California was busting at the seams (and white men were coming in in droves, pushing aside Mexicans and Indians who had lived there for decades), and desired to become a state. Should the Missouri Compromise line of 1820 be extended, with slavery excluded above the line? Or should states themselves be allowed to determine whether or not slavery should be allowed? Should California be admitted as a single state, or split into two or more states?

2) The western boundary of Texas had never been established. The state claimed much of what is now New Mexico, including Santa Fe and most of the other populated areas - and was ready to raise an army (of desperados, former Texas Rangers, etc.) to take it from the federal government.

3) Strengthening the Fugitive Slave Act (forcing citizens of northern states to aide federal agents in capturing runaway slaves).

4) Eliminating the Slave Trade (although not slavery itself) within the District of Columbia.

The debate got so heated at one point that Senator Henry Foote, of Mississippi, drew a pistol on Senator Thomas H. Benton, of Missouri - on the Senate floor! (Foote claimed self-defense, since the much larger Benton was charging at him. Foote was eventually exonerated of wrong-doing.)

There was even an overview of the failed attempt to invade Cuba in 1850 by southerners. (Their goal, of course, was to have Cuba become a slave state in the U.S.)

I found this book especially interesting not only because it dealt with events leading up to the Civil War and described the early years of some who became leaders on both sides, but because it dealt with parliamentary procedure and the rules of the Senate and House. There was just enough discussion of "splitting the motion" and "calling the question" - and their ramifications during the debate - to be thrilling to a geek like me. :)

The biggest problem I had with the book was that it came across as too academic, too dry. But the author often quoted from speeches of the day, which did tend to be long, adding to the length and complexity of his sentences. Also, I took issue with the subtitle, "... the Compromise that Preserved the Union". I can't say that the compromise 'preserved' the Union, as much as it delayed the Civil War by a decade. :(

General 'Dee Dubya' Mallory
Chief of the Armies, CSA

 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2021 11:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 4:51 pm
Posts: 3524
Location: Massachusetts, USA
An interesting political time.

General Ernie Sands
President ACWGC -Sept 2015- Dec 2020
7th Brigade, 1st Division, XVI Corps, AoT
ACWGC Records Site Admin

"If you do not know where you are going, any road will take you there."

 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 1:55 am
Posts: 870
Location: Tennessee
The best all around pre-Civil War book I read is "The Impending Crisis: 1848 - 1861" by David M. Potter. Published back in 1976 the book still holds up well (I think) and gives you a thorough overview of what caused the Civil War in the decade leading up to 1861.

Gen. Blake Strickler
Confederate General-in-Chief
El Presidente 2010 - 2012


 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group