<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Bill Peters</i>
<br />Note that nothing in here says anything about 25 men....
...Thus "1" man will cause a morale check. And there is no calculation as per the Panzer series where the losses have anything to do with the serverity of the test...
...Thus if you lose 1 man or 200 men it doesnt matter. Same test.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Bill, I believe you are correct in saying that there is no difference in severity of the actual morale test based on the number of casualties suffered. However, the formula on the probability of <b>causing</b> a morale test that Kennon gave can be found in the 'Combat Results' section of the manual:
<font face="Arial">When Morale Checks are applicable, they are determined based on a probability using the given loss as:
loss / (loss + 25)
Thus a unit that takes a loss of 25 men has a 50% chance of requiring a morale check and a unit that takes a loss of 100 men has an 80% chance of requiring a morale check.</font id="Arial">
[url="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/a.r.barlow/acwgc/acw.htm"]General Antony Barlow[/url]
[url="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/a.r.barlow/acwgc/western_theater.htm"]Commander, Western Theater, Union Army[/url]