<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by sharpie</i>
Sir, I have plenty of spirit and I thought this Tavern was for good natured banter between armies. John will attempt to teach me a lesson and if he is not really upset then neither should you be.
Lt Colonel Asher
1st Light Dragoons KGL
3rd Cav Bde
Anglo Cav Corps
7th Dragoon Guards
"The Black Horse"
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Monsieur
I have no lesson to give you (as well you have no one to give me).I just explained with my bad english that I didn't like your message because you mentioned two players for bad reasons :
- One (Andy Moss) because he get many points. In my bad anglish, I understood that you wanted to say that he played easy french players to get these points. But may be I'm wrong ?
- the second, John, because he was an easy opponent from your point of view.But may be again,I misunterstood.
It's the reason why, I proposed you to delete your message.You have a different point of view.No problem with me on this point.
More than to give a lesson to you or you to me, I think, we have better to do. First, because I don't want to begin any dispute with you : we have two point of view and we must to respect its.
Second, because I find your message point out a problem that I have a lot of difficulties to resolve.
It's true that a victory against Jeff Bardon or Tomasz is a harder result to have than a victory against me.So I agree to consider that in the top, we must take account of this.
As DS Walter pointed out in an other message, we must take also account of the scenario's number of turn, including the campaign.
So, if you have any idea (I have some) or any help to give me about these problems, I think you made a greater job than to give me easily a lesson.
By the way, happy new year for you and yours
Regards
General de Division Lamezec
Comte de Davout
CO 2ème Division de Cavalerie légère
ADN2