Good deal....
| Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC) https://wargame.ch/board/nwc/ |
|
| returned to the cabinet https://wargame.ch/board/nwc/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13892 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | bijl0130 [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | returned to the cabinet |
Dear all, on request of several cabinet members and many officers I returned the position of CiC, and thus myself, today to the Cabinet. |
|
| Author: | John Corbin [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
Thanks for coming back Marco |
|
| Author: | Antony Barlow [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
A positive step. Thanks Marco. |
|
| Author: | David Stotsenburgh [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
I have to agree this is a positive step. thanks for returning |
|
| Author: | Scott Ludwig [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
Good deal....
|
|
| Author: | MCJones1810 [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
Sorry Marco, but that is not how this works. You cannot simply come and go as you please. You were appointed to the Cabinet on July 13, 2011 by the five Cabinet members then standing who were John Corbin, Scott Ludwig, Chuck Jensen, Jeka Gulyaev, and Gary McClellan who had stepped down as the Coalition CinC thus creating the vacancy. You resigned of your own free will, but you cannot return to a post that you willfully abandoned in the same manner. I will consult the four standing Cabinet members to see if they are willing to allow you to return to the Cabinet. Under the precedent buy which you became the Coalition CinC, i.e. Cabinet Appointment, they would also have the right to appoint someone to take your place. Their majority vote will decide the issue. If the new club rules are adopted, it will thereafter be the members who decide the issue by their majority vote. |
|
| Author: | Ed Blackburn [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
That sounds fair Mark. |
|
| Author: | David Guegan [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
| Author: | David Stotsenburgh [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
I agree with David, big difference between retreating and resigning. |
|
| Author: | Ed Blackburn [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
I see no difference at all, it is simply parsing now that he wants to come back. |
|
| Author: | Jim Hall [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
Gentlemen "How many Officers can dance on the Head of a Needle" Brigade to the front  OED Retreat = Retire Would the Cabinet give this matter some carful consideration  By all means take a vote on the return issue, if there is a tie then consider how it may be resolved. Either hold a quick election for a replacement for the "retired" C. C. in C. or co-opt a member that all Cabinet Members approve until the Rule vote is decided . |
|
| Author: | David Guegan [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
| Author: | David Guegan [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
I have to say I don't like the first sentence of the example please read Coalition instead of French 
|
|
| Author: | Jim Hall [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
Gentlemen Perhaps I should have put "Fairies" not "Officers"  I will show you my edition if you will show me yours
|
|
| Author: | Tony Barrett [ Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: returned to the cabinet |
First people complain that he stepped down because he should/could not - Now people complain he stepped up because he should/could not. Stepping up puts us where we were - So ....... is there some method whereby we can :- (a) Decide if he should stay. (b) Decide who would replace him. I don't know the man - I did not realise until recently that there was so much politics within the club. I am just airing "my" confusion over "my" perception of recent events - suppose I should add "again"  Perhaps I should start my own web site - Confused dot Com. Rats! Someone has beaten me to it.
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|