Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC)

In fairness I think it would be better if we decided in the French Army to elect our Corps Commanders since our friends and fellow members on the other side (Coalition) will have to vote for their different armies commanders.
We have 5 corps and they have 5 armies.

What do you think about it?

_________________
Général David Guegan

3ème Régiment de Grenadiers - Bataillon d'élite du 3ème Légère
2ème Brigade
Grenadiers de la Réserve
Réserve
La Grande Armée
--------------------------
"From the sublime to the ridiculous is but a step."
Napoléon Bonaparte

Military justice is to justice what military music is to music.
Groucho Marx

An interesting proposal, especially considering most French Corps' are the size of most of the Coalition Armies....

voting offers the members a chance to make their voice heard. I would have no issue with it

_________________
Général Art Ozols
3ème Régiment
2ème Division de Dragons
La Réserve de Cavalerie
La Grande Armée

I find the idea of electing LGA corps commanders a very plausible idea. We could achieve this within the LGA by simply deciding to it.My only caveat would be the elected commaders understood their responsibilities. But I am sure we could work it out.

I agree with Al. This is a good idea

Salute!

It certainly would take a lot of nerve to argue against the membership having the privilege of choosing their leaders.

For myself, to keep things simple in the club I would have preferred each main club army elect the CiC (for the two year term) who then appoints his subordinate commanders - by electing the CiC the membership are obviously approving that person for the job, and should have faith in his decisions going forward - until the next election.

But, if the Revised Club Rules are approved by the majority of the membership - then as they stand the Coalition armies will be electing their leaders, and whether out of sense of fairness or desire to have the same privilege and responsibility within the ranks of LGA, I would support such a measure.

Regards,

The revolutionary Armee was built on that ask Nay ask some of the great leadersby Bill Peterson

How does one define the Napoleonic Era? Sometimes, we seem to think the nations and armies we study sprang to life in 1805, from nothing. If one viewed history only through currently-available Talonsoft and HPS wargames, Europe was created in 1809!

To understand an era, one must try to see it through the eyes of the people who lived it. What were their formative experiences? Why did they believe what they believed?

The two chief iconic figures of the Napoleonic Era, Napoleone Buonaparte and Arthur Wellesley, were both born in 1769. They turned 20 in 1789, the year of the French Revolution; their entire adult lives were consumed with the ensuing convulsions. Blücher was then a 47-year-old Lieutenant-Colonel in Prussia's Black Hussars; Kutusov, 44, was leading Jägers against the Turks; the Archduke Charles was turning 18. All these, and practically every actor in the Napoleonic epic, were profoundly marked by the years 1789-1805.

My own interest in the Revolutionary back-story of the Napoleonic Era has been stimulated by my current project, translating Chuquet's Les Guerres de la Révolution, Volume II: Valmy for the Nafziger Collection. One of the central figures encountered in that work is Dumouriez, the hero (with Kellermann) of Valmy, savior of the Revolution, and a towering personality every bit as ruthless and ambitious as Bonaparte. A fascinating alternate-history exercise is to consider what might have occurred had Dumouriez not fallen out of political favor after the Battle of Neerwinden and turned traitor to save his neck: We could well be studying the campaigns of the Dumouriez Era.

Learn about Dumouriez in Meet the Leaders, sing Revolutionary songs from The NWC Songbook, and admire the images of battles and uniforms from the 1790's.

Aux armes, citoyens!

Question is how many eligible candidates do we have for the post of a corps commander?
It would be nice if we could vote but I would also not mind if the CiC fills the position with the one he thinks is the best.

Cliff......the historical points you mention are very, very neat! I like reading it a lot....I might be coming to you to do a Newsletter article...

I have no problem with the concept and would not mind being supplanted by someone else, but I do question whether we have a significant number of members in our corps seeking for greater responsibility and involvement. I currently have a vacant division command slot and several brigades within the corps lacking commanders. If we don't have additional people ready and willing to step up I'm not sure what elections would accomplish. On the other hand, perhaps corps members would feel more inclined to support someone they have chosen themselves....

_________________
Maréchal d'Empire Theron Lambert
Grand-duc de Montereau et Duc d'Angers

Why not limiting the Corps and full the post with what you have!

_________________
Général David Guegan

3ème Régiment de Grenadiers - Bataillon d'élite du 3ème Légère
2ème Brigade
Grenadiers de la Réserve
Réserve
La Grande Armée
--------------------------
"From the sublime to the ridiculous is but a step."
Napoléon Bonaparte

Military justice is to justice what military music is to music.
Groucho Marx