American Civil War Game Club (ACWGC)

ACWGC Forums

* ACWGC    * Dpt. of Records (DoR)    *Club Recruiting Office     ACWGC Memorial

* CSA HQ    * VMI   * Join CSA    

* Union HQ   * UMA   * Join Union    

CSA Armies:   ANV  AoT

Union Armies:   AotP    AotT

Link Express

Club Forums:     NWC    CCC     Home Pages:     NWC    CCC    ACWGC
It is currently Sat May 16, 2026 4:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2026 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:42 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Port Macquarie NSW Australia
During a recent game the following situation occurred:
The Confederates had two routed/isolated units and one disrupted/isolated unit in the hex north-west of the hex marked 'O' and were facing the 'O' hex;
One Union infantry united meleed those units from the hex marked 'O';
The Union won the melee; and
All Confederate units 'retreated forward' into a ZoC as shown by the arrow.
Image

The game 'rule' (which makes no logical sense to me) appears to be that:
The disrupted/isolated unit was then allowed to 'retreat forward' because it was stacked with routed units (if it wasn't then it would have been eliminated because it couldn't retreat to the rear): the routed/isolated units were able to retreat forward because they were stacked with an unrouted unit (or they would have been eliminated in an automatic victory).

That's crazy! Why is it so?

_________________
Paul Swanson
Lieutenant-General
First Division
First Corps
Army of Northern Virginia


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2026 8:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:52 am
Posts: 1355
To me, it appears they could retreat forward because there is no indication in the diagram that the Confederate frontal hexes were in the Union units' zone of control.

_________________
MG Mike Mihalik
Forrest's Cavalry Corps
AoWest/CSA


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2026 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:42 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Port Macquarie NSW Australia
mihalik wrote:
To me, it appears they could retreat forward because there is no indication in the diagram that the Confederate frontal hexes were in the Union units' zone of control.


The hex that the CSA 'retreated' to was in Union ZoC from their unlimbered artillery and the unit in the hex marked 'O'. The only other vacant hex at the time of melee was to the south-east of the 'O' hex and again that was in the ZoC of the Union unit in that hex.
Also, in normal circumstances (no isolated/routed units), a unit retreating following a melee can only retreat to the three rearward hexes (not the three forward facing hexes). If such a unit cannot retreat into a rearward hex (e.g. they are occupied by enemy units) that retreating unit is eliminated.

_________________
Paul Swanson
Lieutenant-General
First Division
First Corps
Army of Northern Virginia


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2026 10:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:52 am
Posts: 1355
The zone of control of a unit only extends into its three frontal hexes, so the hex the Confederate unit retreated forward into could not be in the zone of control of the unit marked '0' or the pictured artillery. My extensive experience has been that units can and often do retreat into one of their three frontal hexes even sometimes when all the rear hexes aren't blocked. But I play phase almost exclusively.

_________________
MG Mike Mihalik
Forrest's Cavalry Corps
AoWest/CSA


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:42 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Port Macquarie NSW Australia
mihalik wrote:
The zone of control of a unit only extends into its three frontal hexes, so the hex the Confederate unit retreated forward into could not be in the zone of control of the unit marked '0' or the pictured artillery. My extensive experience has been that units can and often do retreat into one of their three frontal hexes even sometimes when all the rear hexes aren't blocked. But I play phase almost exclusively.


"The zone of control of a unit only extends into its three frontal hexes"

Yes, exactly. The three frontal hexes for the unit in 'O' are north, north-west and south-west of it. The CSA units' retreated into their left forward hex which was in the ZoC of both the unit at 'O' and the artillery units.

"so the hex the Confederate unit retreated forward into could not be in the zone of control of the unit marked '0' or the pictured artillery"

But it was clearly in ZoC as shown in the screenshot.

"My extensive experience has been that units can and often do retreat into one of their three frontal hexes even sometimes when all the rear hexes aren't blocked."

That should never happen. If all retreat hexes (the three rearward ones) are blocked the defending unit should be eliminated if required to retreat.

The odd thing about the situation I described was that this normal rule was somehow nullified because routed/isolated units were stacked with a disrupted/isolated unit. Had they all been routed/isolated, or all disrupted/isolated, they would have been eliminated because the only two vacant hexes available to the CSA units were two of its 'forward hexes'. Also, both vacant hexes were also in enemy ZoC, although even if they weren't [say the 'O' and artillery units were facing the other way] it should not have mattered as they were forward hexes for the CSA units.

_________________
Paul Swanson
Lieutenant-General
First Division
First Corps
Army of Northern Virginia


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 8:03 pm
Posts: 2478
Location: USA
I would have expected total elimination of the Confederate units. Since they weren't, obviously, they had been drinking very heavily.

_________________
Gen Ned Simms
2/XVI Corps/AotT
Blood 'n Guts hisself, a land lovin' pirate. Show me some arty tubes and we'll charge 'em.
VMI Class of '00


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 1:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:42 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Port Macquarie NSW Australia
nsimms wrote:
I would have expected total elimination of the Confederate units. Since they weren't, obviously, they had been drinking very heavily.


LOL, I don't doubt that for a minute.

_________________
Paul Swanson
Lieutenant-General
First Division
First Corps
Army of Northern Virginia


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 9:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:52 am
Posts: 1355
Well, I'm done arguing. Why don't you submit this to WDS and see what they tell you.

_________________
MG Mike Mihalik
Forrest's Cavalry Corps
AoWest/CSA


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 1:55 am
Posts: 1270
Location: Tennessee
Simple Answer:

The old system of three in the rear and one in the front is no longer in place. That used to be a thing but WDS got rid of it. I assume to reduce the number of captures.

And, yes, units can retreat forward into free hexes.

Don't shoot the messenger I am just telling you what's what. WDS sets the rules.

OLD WDS MANUAL
Attachment:
Screenshot 2026-05-15 133438.png
Screenshot 2026-05-15 133438.png [ 135.11 KiB | Viewed 73 times ]


NEW WDS MANUAL
Attachment:
Screenshot 2026-05-15 133707.png
Screenshot 2026-05-15 133707.png [ 180.61 KiB | Viewed 73 times ]

_________________
Gen. Blake Strickler
Confederate General-in-Chief
El Presidente 2010 - 2012

Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:42 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Port Macquarie NSW Australia
"The old system of three in the rear and one in the front is no longer in place."

Yes it is, that still works.

The Manual diagrams posted remain correct. In the second diagram [Optional Rule Weak ZoC checked which is the norm] the Union unit has a rearward hex (north-west of it) in which to retreat which it uses. Had that hex been occupied and one of the forward hexes (south-west, south, south-east) been vacant it would have been eliminated.

It is only in the situation I described was that this normal rule was somehow nullified because routed/isolated units were stacked with a disrupted/isolated unit. Had they all been routed/isolated, or all disrupted/isolated, they would have been eliminated because the only two vacant hexes available to the CSA units were two of its 'forward hexes'. This situation is an unwritten rule that makes no sense to me as degraded units stacking together are somehow able to utilise a loophole unavailable to other units.

_________________
Paul Swanson
Lieutenant-General
First Division
First Corps
Army of Northern Virginia


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 1:55 am
Posts: 1270
Location: Tennessee
Submit it to WDS and see what they say.

These games have hundreds of variables (thousands?) and people still find things from time to time for sure. I am more afraid that in order to fix a one in a million issue that they accidently tweak a much more important issue. But that's just me.

_________________
Gen. Blake Strickler
Confederate General-in-Chief
El Presidente 2010 - 2012

Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:42 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Port Macquarie NSW Australia
Blake wrote:
Submit it to WDS and see what they say.

These games have hundreds of variables (thousands?) and people still find things from time to time for sure. I am more afraid that in order to fix a one in a million issue that they accidently tweak a much more important issue. But that's just me.


I only raised it 'unofficially', it's a 'byproduct' of other things.
In other instances 'blocking the rearward hexes' still works just fine. I just eliminated a couple of hundred enemy cavalry doing just that (even though they had a forward hex to 'retreat' into).

_________________
Paul Swanson
Lieutenant-General
First Division
First Corps
Army of Northern Virginia


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A Crazy Situation
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2026 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2021 8:52 pm
Posts: 121
Seems like routed units can rout in any direction but unrouted units can only go rearward. When they share a hex and lose a melee it creates a situation where the game has to choose which rule to follow for the entire stack. The stack can only do one of two things: surrender or retreat. The stack can't do different things because the hex is overrun and the units must leave together or surrender together. No matter which they do someone will say they should have done the other instead.

_________________
Gen. Mitch Johnson
GENERAL IN CHIEF

Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 256 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group