|
Gents, I see no point in debating the past regarding who said what to whom. Mark and Al left without explanation and that is there perogative, but this is clear---the other club got their domain name in March. Did all of this work get done between our last election, which finished a few weeks ago? I doubt it. Of course, Al was not up for election but Mark won (unopposed) the Coalition Election in August. Why would he run if he was leaving? I am asking because I do not know and actually, I really do not care.
So I think this is weird-why push through new club rules (with zero option for club members to add or subtract from them), run for election, etc when you are leaving and quietly setting up a new club. Why expel people from the club for disagreeing with you when you knew you were going to quit? It odd behavior to me, because, after all, these are games where grown men play toy soldiers.
When I look back at the threads where all of the arguing took place, I do not see anyone who really comes off looking good. So we can say he said this and he said that but the if you look at it, you see lots of people being nasty and pointing fingers. I do not see a point in continuing this discussion.
So I think we should move forward, if anyone wants my personal opinion they can ask but for now we should let past arguments stay in the past. Anyone who wants dual membership or wants to leave should do whatever they want. To make anything more of it is to waste our own time, because we cannot change the past, we cannot know the opinions of those who are not here to share them, etc, etc. I do not care what Todd and Roy knew when etc., as long as they do the work in this club that we elected them to do. I have had my disagreements (mostly in public, on the boards) with Todd in the past, but he and I are working together with the rest of the Coalition team right now and that is all I care about.
sorry for the long post.
|